Why the study?
Does intravenous nicorandil reduce the composite of all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization in patients with acute heart failure syndrome?
Does intravenous nicorandil reduce the composite of all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization in patients with acute heart failure syndrome?
Intravenous nicorandil administered in the urgent phase of acute heart failure syndrome may significantly reduce the mid-term risk of all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization.
Should not yet change acute HF practice; leaves open a potential nicorandil role pending randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS) remains a major clinical challenge because of its poor prognosis. Nicorandil, a hybrid compound of a potassium-channel opener and nitric oxide donor, has been reported to improve the prognosis of ischemic heart disease. We sought to evaluate the effect of intravenous nicorandil on the mid-term prognosis of AHFS. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 402 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for AHFS were divided into 2 groups according to the use of intravenous nicorandil: 78 patients in the Nicorandil group and 324 patients in the Control group. During the 180-day follow-up, death or rehospitalization for heart failure occurred in 7 patients in the Nicorandil group (9.0%) and in 75 patients (23.2%) in the Control group. Event-free survival rates were significantly higher in the Nicorandil group than in the Control group (P=0.006). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio (HR)=1.066, P<0.0001), systolic blood pressure (HR=0.983, P=0.0023), New York Heart Association class III/IV (HR=6.550, P<0.0001), log creatinine (HR=3.866, P=0.0106), and use of intravenous nicorandil (HR=0.179, P<0.0001) were significant predictive factors for the occurrence of death or rehospitalization for heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous nicorandil treatment from the urgent phase of AHFS may improve the prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishihara et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: