Why the study?
To evaluate the association between admission PRECISE-DAPT score and the development of no-reflow in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI.
Is the PRECISE-DAPT score associated with the development of no-reflow in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI?
Is the PRECISE-DAPT score associated with the development of no-reflow in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI?
A higher PRECISE-DAPT score at admission is independently associated with an increased risk of no-reflow and worse in-hospital outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
May aid no-reflow risk stratification in STEMI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
This study aimed to evaluate the association of admission PREdicting bleeding Complications In patients undergoing Stent implantation and subsEquent Dual Anti Platelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score with the development of no-reflow (NR) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational, retrospective study, 335 consecutive STEMI patients who were treated with primary PCI were included. We classified the study population into 2 groups: patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score <25 and those with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25. Overall, 30 (8.9%) patients developed NR. The mean PRECISE-DAPT score (20.03 ± 15.32 vs 11.33 ± 12.18; P = .005) was significantly higher in cases who developed NR. Moreover, arrhythmic complications, in-hospital shock, and in-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 compared to those with a PRECISE-DAPT score <25. According to a multivariable analysis, the PRECISE-DAPT score was found to be independently linked with NR (odds ratio: 2.87, with P = .015). To our knowledge, these data are the first in major medical science databases to determine the relationship between the PRECISE-DAPT score and the NR phenomenon in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selçuk et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: