Why the study?
Does slow AV nodal pathway ablation alter the irregularity of the ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia?
Does slow AV nodal pathway ablation alter the irregularity of the ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia?
Slow AV nodal pathway ablation alters the relationship between absolute heart rate variability and mean ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation, indicating that dual AV nodal pathway physiology contributes to ventricular rhythm irregularity.
May reduce AF ventricular irregularity via dual-pathway effects; hypothesis-generating for ablation in AVNRT, needs prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: The contribution of dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway physiology to the irregularity of the ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation has not been clarified. HYPOTHESIS: This study was performed to assess the effects of slow AV nodal pathway ablation on the irregularity of the ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Irregularity of the ventricular rhythm was quantified using analysis of heart rate variability. In 20 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, absolute heart rate variability during atrial fibrillation was quantified before and after slow AV nodal pathway ablation by the standard deviation of all NN intervals (SDNN). Relative heart rate variability was determined by computing the coefficient of variation, SDNN normalized for the standard deviation of the mean ventricular cycle length (MVCL-AF). RESULTS: The slope of the regression between MVCL-AF and SDNN was significantly more gradual after slow pathway ablation (slope 0.39 vs. 0.23, p < 0.001). Coefficient of variation increased in 12 patients with heart rates > 120 beats/min at baseline (18.6 +/- 3.9 vs. 22.1 +/- 2.7% MVCL-AF, p < 0.05), but decreased in 8 patients with heart rates < 120 beats/min at baseline (25.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 22.2 +/- 2.2% MVCL-AF, p = 0.05). Furthermore, coefficient of variation correlated with MVCL-AF only at baseline (slope 0.034, r = 0.66), but no relation was found after slow pathway ablation (slope 0, r = 0). CONCLUSIONS: Slow AV nodal pathway ablation alters the relation between absolute heart rate variability and mean ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation and eliminates cycle length dependency of relative heart rate variability. These data indicate that dual AV nodal pathway physiology contributes to the irregularity of the ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camm et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: