Why the study?
Does a single dose of nicotine gum affect resting-state EEG alpha oscillations in healthy non-smoking adult males, and is this modulated by COMT Val158Met polymorphism?
Does a single dose of nicotine gum affect resting-state EEG alpha oscillations in healthy non-smoking adult males, and is this modulated by COMT Val158Met polymorphism?
Acute nicotine administration alters resting-state EEG alpha oscillations in a manner dependent on the COMT Val158Met polymorphism in healthy non-smoking males.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genotype modulates acute nicotine effects on alpha EEG; extends pharmacogenetic evidence but leaves clinical translation open.
Performance improvements in cognitive tasks requiring executive functions are evident with nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists, and activation of the underlying neural circuitry supporting these cognitive effects is thought to involve dopamine neurotransmission. As individual difference in response to nicotine may be related to a functional polymorphism in the gene encoding catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), an enzyme that strongly influences cortical dopamine metabolism, this study examined the modulatory effects of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism on the neural response to acute nicotine as measured with resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) oscillations. In a sample of 62 healthy non-smoking adult males, a single dose (6 mg) of nicotine gum administered in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was shown to affect α oscillatory activity, increasing power of upper α oscillations in frontocentral regions of Met/Met homozygotes and in parietal/occipital regions of Val/Met heterozygotes. Peak α frequency was also found to be faster with nicotine (vs. placebo) treatment in Val/Met heterozygotes, who exhibited a slower α frequency compared to Val/Val homozygotes. The data tentatively suggest that interindividual differences in brain α oscillations and their response to nicotinic agonist treatment are influenced by genetic mechanisms involving COMT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowers et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: