Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Colloidal cadmium sulfide (CdS) quantum dots (QDs) were prepared and surface modified by mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA) to render a surface with carboxylic acid groups (MSA-CdS). The MSA-CdS QDs were then assembled onto bare TiO(2) mesoporous films using the carboxylic groups/TiO(2) interaction. The TiO(2) film was also surface modified by 3-mercaptopropyl trimethoxysilane (MPTMS) or 3-aminopropyl-methyl diethoxysilane (APMDS) to prepare, respectively, a thiol (-SH) or amino (-NH(2)) terminated surface for binding with the CdS QDs. The experimental results showed that the MPTMS-modified film has the highest adsorption rate and adsorption amount to the CdS QDs, attributable to the strong thiol/CdS interaction. In contrast, the adsorption rate and incorporated amount of the QDs on the bare TiO(2) film are much lower than for the silane-modified films. The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) obtained for the CdS-sensitized TiO(2) electrode was about 20% (at 400 nm) for the bare TiO(2), 13% for the MPTMS-TiO(2), and 6% for APMDS-TiO(2). The current-voltage measurement under dark conditions reveals a higher dark current on the MPTMS- and APMDS-modified electrodes, indicating a lower coverage ratio of CdS on these TiO(2) films. This result is attributed to the fast adsorption rate of CdS QDs on the bottleneck of a mesopore which inhibits the transport of the QDs deep into the inner region of a pore. For the bare TiO(2) film, the lower incorporated amount of CdS but higher energy conversion efficiency indicates the formation of a better-covered CdS QDs monolayer. The moderate adsorption rate of MSA-CdS QDs using the carboxylic acid/TiO(2) interaction is responsible for the efficient assembly of QDs onto the mesoporous TiO(2) films.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: