Why the study?
Does a four-parameter risk model including 123I-MIBG imaging improve prediction of 2-year cardiac mortality compared to LVEF, natriuretic peptides, or HMR alone in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does a four-parameter risk model including 123I-MIBG imaging improve prediction of 2-year cardiac mortality compared to LVEF, natriuretic peptides, or HMR alone in patients with chronic heart failure?
A four-parameter risk model incorporating 123I-MIBG imaging successfully predicts 2-year cardiac mortality in chronic heart failure patients, outperforming LVEF and natriuretic peptides.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid 2-year mortality stratification in chronic HF beyond single markers; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Aims: The aim of this study was to validate a four-parameter risk model including 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging, which was previously developed for predicting cardiac mortality, in a new cohort of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and results: Clinical and outcome data were retrospectively obtained from 546 patients (age 66 ± 14 years) who had undergone 123I-MIBG imaging with a heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR). The mean follow-up time was 30 ± 20 months, and the endpoint was cardiac death. The mortality outcome predicted by the model was compared with actual 2-year event rates in pre-specified risk categories of three or four risk groups using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for cardiac death and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Cardiac death occurred in 137 patients, including 105 (68%) patients due to heart-failure death. With a 2-year mortality risk from the model divided into three categories of low- (<4%), intermediate- (4-12%), and high-risk (>12%), 2-year cardiac mortality was 1.1%, 7.9%, and 54.7%, respectively in the validation population (P < 0.0001). In a quartile analysis, although the predicted numbers of cardiac death was comparable with actual number of cardiac death for low- to intermediate-risk groups with a mortality risk <13.8%, it was underestimated in the high-risk group with a mortality risk ≥13.8%. The ROC analysis showed that the 2-year risk model had better (P < 0.0001) diagnostic ability for predicting heart failure death than left ventricular ejection fraction, natriuretic peptides or HMR alone. Conclusion: The 2-year risk model was successfully validated particularly in CHF patients at a low to intermediate cardiac mortality risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakajima et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: