Flow heterogeneity and local flow similarity are higher in blood-perfused rat hearts compared to crystalloid-perfused hearts, highlighting the role of blood corpuscles and coronary tone in microregional flow distributions.
Crystalloid-perfused rat hearts may underestimate microregional flow heterogeneity; leaves open translation to in vivo human coronary physiology.
Regional myocardial flow distributions in Langendorff rat hearts under Tyrode and blood perfusion were assessed by tracer digital radiography (100-microm resolution). Flow distributions during baseline and maximal hyperemia following a 60-s flow cessation were evaluated by the coefficient of variation of regional flows (CV; related to global flow heterogeneity) and the correlation between adjacent regional flows (CA; inversely related to local flow randomness). These values were obtained for the original images (64(2) pixels) and for coarse-grained images (32(2), 16(2), and 8(2) blocks of nearby pixels). At a given point in time during baseline, both CV and CA were higher in blood (n = 7) than in Tyrode perfusion (n = 7) over all pixel aggregates (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). During the maximal hyperemia, CV and CA were still significantly higher in blood (n = 7) than in Tyrode perfusion (n = 7); however, these values decreased substantially in blood perfusion and the CV and CA differences became smaller than those at baseline accordingly. During basal blood perfusion, the 60-s average flow distribution (n = 7) showed a smaller CV and CA than those at a given point in time (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). Coronary flow reserve was significantly higher in blood than in Tyrode perfusion. In conclusion, the flow heterogeneity and the local flow similarity are both higher in blood than in Tyrode perfusion, probably due to the different degree of coronary tone preservation and the presence or absence of blood corpuscles. Under blood perfusion, temporal flow fluctuations over 60-s order are largely involved in shaping microregional flow distributions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumoto et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: