Why the study?
Does Y1-receptor and/or alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonism affect basal hindlimb vascular conductance in male Sprague-Dawley rats?
Does Y1-receptor and/or alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonism affect basal hindlimb vascular conductance in male Sprague-Dawley rats?
Y1-receptor activation plays an important role in regulating vascular conductance in the resting rat hindlimb, with a magnitude similar to the alpha1-adrenoceptor contribution.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combined Y1/alpha1 blockade augments basal conductance in rat hindlimb; leaves open translation to human vascular regulation.
The role of endogenous Y(1)-receptor activation on skeletal muscle vasculature under baseline conditions is currently debated and no in vivo studies have been performed to address this issue. Therefore, this study was designed to address the effect of Y(1)-receptor and/or alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonism on basal hindlimb vascular conductance in male Sprague-Dawley rats in vivo. Left hindlimb vascular conductance, carotid artery mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were measured during low volume infusion of N(2)-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-d-arginine amide (BIBP3226; 100 microg/kg), prazosin (20 microg/kg), and combined blockade to the left hindlimb. Vascular conductance increased 1.5 +/- 0.5 microl.min(-1).mmHg(-1) with BIBP3226 infusion, 1.7 +/- 0.5 microl.min(-1).mmHg(-1) with prazosin infusion, and 4.8 +/- 1.0 microl.min(-1).mmHg(-1) with combined blockade (P < 0.05). Interestingly, systolic vascular conductance increased in all three conditions, but diastolic vascular conductance only increased in the two conditions where BIBP3226 was present. These data indicate that Y(1)-receptor activation plays an important role in the regulation of vascular conductance in the resting rat hindlimb. Furthermore, this effect was of the same magnitude as the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor contribution. The differential flow profiles following alpha(1) blockade with and without Y(1)-receptor blockade supports local differences in receptor distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: