Why the study?
Does a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative improve adherence to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and reduce surgical site infection rates in surgical patients?
Does a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative improve adherence to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and reduce surgical site infection rates in surgical patients?
A multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative significantly improved adherence to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and reduced surgical site infection rates.
The aims of this study were to determine adherence to the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) protocol used at a large Italian teaching hospital during a 6-year period, to assess the variables associated with inappropriate administration, and to measure the impact on surgical site infection (SSI) rates. There were 28 621 patients surveyed of which 74·6% received PAP. An improvement in adherence to the PAP protocol was registered for 58·8% of patients. Significant risk factors were an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 2 [odds ratios (OR) from 1·28 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1·19-1·37) to 1·87 (95% CI 1·43-2·44)], prolonged duration of surgery (OR 1·68, 95% CI 1·56-1·82) and urgent surgery (OR 2·16, 95% CI 1·96-2·37). During the study period, a significant reduction in SSIs rates was detected. We concluded that the global reduction of inadequate PAP administration signifies the efficacy of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative on antimicrobial utilization, and this is supported by the observed reduction of the SSI rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prospero et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: