Why the study?
Do smartphone apps and portable pulse oximeters reliably measure heart rate compared to manual radial pulse palpation in healthy adults?
Do smartphone apps and portable pulse oximeters reliably measure heart rate compared to manual radial pulse palpation in healthy adults?
Smartphone apps and low-cost pulse oximeters demonstrate excellent reliability and can serve as valid instruments for assessing heart rate in healthy adults.
May support app-based HR monitoring in healthy adults; hypothesis-generating and requires validation in patients vs ECG.
There are downloadable applications (Apps) for cell phones that can measure heart rate in a simple and painless manner. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of this type of App for a Smartphone using an Android system, compared to the radial pulse and a portable pulse oximeter. We performed a pilot observational study of diagnostic accuracy, randomized in 46 healthy volunteers. The patients' demographic data and cardiac pulse were collected. Radial pulse was measured by palpation of the radial artery with three fingers at the wrist over the radius; a low-cost portable, liquid crystal display finger pulse oximeter; and a Heart Rate Plus for Samsung Galaxy Note®. This study demonstrated high reliability and consistency between systems with respect to the heart rate parameter of healthy adults using three systems. For all parameters, ICC was > 0.93, indicating excellent reliability. Moreover, CVME values for all parameters were between 1.66-4.06 %. We found significant correlation coefficients and no systematic differences between radial pulse palpation and pulse oximeter and a high precision. Low-cost pulse oximeter and App systems can serve as valid instruments for the assessment of heart rate in healthy adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Losa‐Iglesias et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: