Why the study?
Does a fixed combination of felodipine and metoprolol improve blood pressure reduction compared to monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
Does a fixed combination of felodipine and metoprolol improve blood pressure reduction compared to monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
A fixed combination of metoprolol and felodipine provides significantly better blood pressure reduction than either agent alone without decreased tolerability.
Supports fixed felodipine-metoprolol combination over monotherapy for greater BP reduction in mild-moderate hypertension; confirms additive effects in RCT.
In this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, the aim was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new fixed combination of felodipine and metoprolol with the individual components in monotherapy. After a placebo period of 4 weeks, 159 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized to extended-release formulations of either felodipine plus metoprolol 10 + 100 mg (FM), felodipine 10 mg (F), or metoprolol 100 mg (M) once daily if supine diastolic blood pressure greater than 95 mm Hg. After 12 weeks of active treatment, the reductions in supine blood pressure (24 h after dosing) were 20/14, 13/10, and 11/8 mm Hg for FM, F, and M, respectively. The difference in change was 7/4 mm Hg (p = 0.004/p = 0.006) and 8/5 mm Hg (p = 0.0002/p less than 0.0001) for the fixed combination and F or M, respectively. Blood pressure control (diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg after 12 weeks) was significantly better for the combination than for F and M, i.e., 71%, 49% (p = 0.008), and 34% (p = 0.004), respectively. Adverse experiences were those to be expected from previous studies with felodipine and metoprolol and did not differ in frequency between groups. It can be concluded that a fixed combination of metoprolol and felodipine has a clinically relevant and significantly better blood pressure reduction 24 h postdose than the individual substances in monotherapy, without decreased tolerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahlöf et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: