Why the study?
Does a quadrature surface coil improve signal-to-noise ratio compared to a standard phased-array coil in carotid artery imaging?
Does a quadrature surface coil improve signal-to-noise ratio compared to a standard phased-array coil in carotid artery imaging?
A custom-built quadrature surface coil provides better signal-to-noise ratio for carotid artery imaging compared to standard phased-array coils.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet alter coil selection for carotid MRI; leaves open in vivo validation of SNR gains.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of a custom-built coil design to provide improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and less signal drop with increasing depth at the carotid artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phased-array surface coils can provide a high SNR to image the carotid vessel wall. However, given the required field-of-view (FOV) and penetration depth, these coils show either a fast signal drop with increasing depth or a moderate SNR at increased coil size. A quadrature surface coil (a butterfly coil in conjunction with a linear single-loop coil) was compared with a phased-array coil in phantom and human studies. RESULTS: The phantom studies showed that the quadrature coil has better SNR over the required FOV than a standard phased-array coil (26% at 3 cm depth). CONCLUSION: The quadrature coil enables better image quality to be achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ouhlous et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: