This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for using hydroxychloroquine to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients, either before or after exposure, remains unclear. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of different doses and treatment durations of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 prevention. METHOD: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different doses of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 prevention, from their inception to February 2024. RESULTS: A total of 20 RCTs involving 12,372 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed no significant difference between the hydroxychloroquine and control groups in reducing the incidence of syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positivity (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.67, 1.03). However, the subgroup receiving a daily dose of 200-400 mg (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.51, 0.75) and a treatment duration of 5-8 weeks (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.88) showed statistically significant reductions in SARS-CoV-2 positivity. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the most effective intervention was a 200-400 mg dose for 5-8 weeks. . CONCLUSIONS: A hydroxychloroquine dose of 200-400 mg for a duration of 5-8 weeks may moderately reduce the risk of COVID-19 with a relatively low risk of adverse events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: