Why the study?
Does a novel fitting method based on PPG and ECG accurately estimate continuous noninvasive blood pressure compared to gold standard values?
Does a novel fitting method based on PPG and ECG accurately estimate continuous noninvasive blood pressure compared to gold standard values?
A novel continuous noninvasive blood pressure estimation model based on PPG and ECG shows mean differences and standard deviations within standard ranges compared to gold standard measurements.
May enable wearable continuous BP monitoring; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger validation studies.
Implementation of continuous noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement is important for prevention and control of the cardiovascular disease. This paper study a novel continuous noninvasive blood pressure (BP) fitting method based on the photoplethysmography (PPG), electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood volume characteristics. The estimation model of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was established from ECG and PPG in Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC) II openness medical database. According to analysis of Beer–Lambert law applied in arterial blood characteristics and PPG waveform, the estimation model of differential pressure (DP) was constructed. Taking the SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from MIMIC II database as the gold standard value, the validation results show that the mean difference and standard deviation of the fitting results are within the standard range of ([Formula: see text])[Formula: see text]mm/Hg. The method proposed in this paper can effectively achieve continuous BP measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: