Key result
Deep learning ECG model accurately detects LVH with ~0.97 AUROC and differentiates HCM phenocopies.
Why the study?
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy frequently leads to underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis, particularly when distinguishing it from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy and among subtypes, and standard ECG has limited specificity as a standalone tool.
Does a hierarchical deep learning model using standard 12-lead ECGs accurately detect left ventricular hypertrophy, distinguish hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from phenocopies, and classify HCM subtypes?
Observational (n=11,290)
Yes
Does a hierarchical deep learning model using standard 12-lead ECGs accurately detect left ventricular hypertrophy, distinguish hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from phenocopies, and classify HCM subtypes?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.98)
An end-to-end deep learning model using standard 12-lead ECGs can accurately screen for left ventricular hypertrophy, distinguish hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from phenocopies, and classify HCM subtypes, offering a scalable tool for early detection.
May support ECG-based LVH and HCM screening; hypothesis-generating until prospective validation.
Abstract Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) shows heterogeneous clinical features and often leads to underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis, particularly when distinguishing it from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and among HCM subtypes. Although electrocardiography (ECG) is widely available and sensitive, limited specificity constrains its standalone diagnostic value in HCM. We developed a deep learning–based model using standard 12-lead ECGs to simultaneously screen for LVH, distinguish HCM from phenocopies, and classify major HCM subtypes. This study innovatively emulates the clinical diagnostic workflow by establishing an end-to-end, hierarchical intelligent framework that encompasses the complete diagnostic pathway, integrating three key clinical decision-making stages into a unified model. Trained on 12,618 ECGs from 11,290 patients across three centers, the model showed strong performance in the internal testing set and maintained consistent performance in two independent external testing sets. Saliency analysis indicated that predictions relied on physiologically relevant ECG regions. This interpretable, ECG-based approach may support scalable HCM stratification and early phenotyping across diverse clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=11,290). Deep learning-based electrocardiographic analysis model vs. Clinical reference standard (echocardiography/CMR) was evaluated on Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (Stage 1) (AUROC 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.98). A hierarchical deep learning model using standard 12-lead ECGs accurately identified left ventricular hypertrophy (AUROC 0.97), distinguished hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from phenocopies (AUROC 0.93), and classified subtypes (AUROC 0.85).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: