Theoretical framework demonstrates that gravity emerges from order-parameter metric geometry rather than quantized particles, indicating that gravitons do not exist.
The quantization of gravity has been a century-old dilemma in theoretical physics. A core assumption has permeated this endeavor: gravity, like the other fundamental interactions, must be mediated by a fundamental particle — the graviton. The Order Parameter Spacetime Theory provides a different geometric explanation for the origin of interactions. In the higher-dimensional unification framework, gauge interactions (electromagnetic, weak, strong) originate from the curvature along the isometry directions of the internal space; their projection onto four-dimensional spacetime is precisely the gauge bosons (photon, W/Z, gluons). Gravity, on the other hand, originates from the inhomogeneity of the order-parameter space metric along the order-parameter direction, which is directly mapped to the curvature of physical spacetime via the Spacetime Emergence Hypothesis. The geometric origins of the two types of interactions are different: gauge forces are a projection of the internal-space geometry, whereas gravity is a projection of the order-parameter-space geometry along the order-parameter direction, manifested in physical spacetime. This paper proves that, within the Order Parameter Spacetime Theory, there is no corresponding geometric source term for a graviton — gravity is not a quantized manifestation of internal-space curvature, but a macroscopic thermodynamic manifestation of the order-parameter space metric at a Type-B singularity. Gravitational waves are a macroscopic manifestation of the propagation modes of the information dissipation tensor Υ_μν, not a collective behavior of gravitons. The graviton does not exist, nor is it required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
涛 翟 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: