Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis demonstrates that ideological clashes drive institutional exits from Latin American regional organisations, highlighting the fragility of ideologically aligned blocs.
Latin America is characterised by the existence of a large number of overlapping regional international organisations (RIOs). From the late 1990s onward, a ‘Pink Tide’ brought many left-wing governments into office. This development also manifested itself in the creation of new ‘post-liberal’ or ‘post-hegemonic’ RIOs, including ALBA, CELAC and UNASUR, and the transformation of existing organisations. Once the ‘Pink Tide’ began to ebb in the mid-2010s, left-leaning RIOs encountered contestations through exit threats and actual withdrawals. This paper explains the observed pattern and argues that when right-leaning governments ideologically clash with the RIO while not being able to induce change to match their own aspirations, severe dissatisfaction arises. This can culminate in exit threats and – when the RIO is not deemed as highly important by the state in question – lead to withdrawals. The paper concludes with insights into the consequences of these challenges for RIOs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: