Systematic review categorizes spatial data infrastructure evaluation frameworks across a five-level ontological hierarchy, highlighting gaps in multidimensional reference models.
This dataset and reproducibility package supports a systematic literature review of approaches for assessing Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs). The public package contains author-generated study matrices, ontological classifications, the search and eligibility protocol, derived analytical data and methodological documentation. The review classified 73 records and used 61 works in the conceptual synthesis. The five-level ontological classification yielded 38 works at Level 1, 10 at Level 2, 8 at Level 3, 5 at Level 4 and none at Level 5, defined as a reference ontology for multidimensional SDI performance assessment. Copyright-protected full texts, converted article texts, proprietary bibliographic database exports and source abstracts with uncertain redistribution rights are excluded from the public package.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freitas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: