Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 28, 2010Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology

Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SPSamantha E. ParkerBoston UniversityMCMark A. CanfieldTexas Department of State Health ServicesRRRussel RickardNew York State Department of Health

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Parker et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7ed5346e4b721fcdc2fcdbhttps://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20735
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trisomies 13 and 18: Population prevalences, characteristics, and prenatal diagnosis, metropolitan Atlanta, 1994–20032008 · 116 citations
  2. 2Changes in the birth prevalence of selected birth defects after grain fortification wiht folic acid in the United States: Findings from a multi-state population-based study2005 · 214 citations
  3. 3Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Elective Termination on Prevalence and Risk Estimates of Neural Tube Defects in California, 1989-19911996 · 134 citations