Why the study?
Does hemodynamic evaluation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory improve decision-making in patients with combined mitral and aortic stenosis?
Does hemodynamic evaluation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory improve decision-making in patients with combined mitral and aortic stenosis?
Hemodynamic evaluation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory provides critical information for guiding surgical therapy in patients with combined mitral and aortic stenosis when noninvasive assessment is uncertain.
Supports cath-lab hemodynamics for surgical decisions when noninvasive data conflict in mixed stenosis; leaves open prospective outcome trials.
Accurate assessment of valvular hemodynamics is essential in the decision-making process when referring a patient for cardiac surgery who has suspected coexistent aortic and mitral valve disease. Often times, one valvular lesion is worse than the other, and the question of "prophylactically" replacing the less severe valve at the time of surgery is controversial. In these situations and because of uncertainty regarding noninvasive assessment, hemodynamic evaluation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory provides critical information in guiding therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suh et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: