Key result
Fragmented QRS complex was a strong independent predictor of CCTA-documented CAD (OR 2.15, p<0.001), with CAD present in 71.4% of patients with fQRS versus 5.4% without.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between fragmented QRS complex and plaque burden assessed by CCTA in patients with typical chest pain and intermediate pretest probability of CAD.
Does the presence of fragmented QRS complex on ECG predict plaque burden and CAD in patients with intermediate pretest probability of CAD?
Observational (n=172)
Does the presence of fragmented QRS complex on ECG predict plaque burden and CAD in patients with intermediate pretest probability of CAD?
Odds Ratio: 2.15
Absolute Event Rate: 71.4% vs 5.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Fragmented QRS on ECG is an independent predictor of CAD and higher plaque burden in patients with intermediate pretest probability of CAD, suggesting its utility as a noninvasive prognosticator.
May help identify CAD in intermediate-probability patients but should not yet change practice; leaves open prospective confirmation of clinical utility.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between fragmented QRS complex and plaque burden in patients presented with typical chest pain and deemed to have intermediate pretest probability of CAD using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS: We studied electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained from 172 subjects (47.5 ± 9.5 years, 125 were men) presented with chest pain and had intermediate pretest probability for CAD. The presence was found and evaluation of CAD was performed with CCTA. RESULTS: Seventy four (43%) of the study cohort had CCTA-documented CAD. Meanwhile the frequency of fQRS in our cohort was (57%). 70 (71.4%) patients with fQRS had CAD compared with only 4 (5.4%) patients without fQRS (p < 0.001). The number of leads with fQRs was correlated with the calcium score (p < 0.005), segment stenosis score, segment involvement score, total plaque score (TPS), and E/e ratio (p < 0.001, for all). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that fQRS was a strong independent predictor for CAD (or = 2.15, p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that the number of leads ≥3 was the optimal number for predicting CAD (AUC = 0.89, sensitivity 88%, and specificity 83%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fragmented QRS was seen more often in patients with high plaque burden. We suggest that fQRS might provide a useful noninvasive prognosticator for subjects with intermediate pretest probability of CAD for further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahfouz et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Intermediate pretest probability of CAD (n=172). Fragmented QRS complex vs. Absence of fragmented QRS complex was evaluated on CCTA-documented CAD (OR 2.15, p=<0.001). Fragmented QRS complex was a strong independent predictor of CCTA-documented CAD (OR 2.15, p<0.001), with CAD present in 71.4% of patients with fQRS versus 5.4% without.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: