Key result
The constant-flow with closed circulation (CFCC) Langendorff perfusion method maintained stable cardiac parameters for 60 minutes and yielded similar outputs to the traditional open system.
Why the study?
Traditional ex vivo Langendorff heart perfusion methods consume large perfusate volumes, creating a need for cost-effective screening assays to rapidly detect acute drug cardiotoxicity.
The CFCC ex vivo heart perfusion method is a reliable, cost-effective alternative to traditional open circulation for early-stage cardiac drug screening and cardiotoxicity assessment.
Should not change practice; extends Langendorff methods but leaves open human cardiotoxicity prediction.
Cardiovascular diseases represent an economic burden for health systems accounting for substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite timely and costly efforts in drug development, the cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the drugs are not always fully achieved. These lead to the drugs' withdrawal with adverse cardiac effects from the market or in the late stages of drug development. There is a growing need for a cost-effective drug screening assay to rapidly detect potential acute drug cardiotoxicity. The Langendorff isolated heart perfusion technique, which provides cardiac hemodynamic parameters (e.g., contractile function and heart rate), has become a powerful approach in the early drug discovery phase to overcome drawbacks in the drug candidate's identification. However, traditional ex vivo retrograde heart perfusion methods consume a large volume of perfusate, which increases the cost and limits compound screening. An elegant and cost-effective alternative mode for ex vivo retrograde heart perfusion is the constant-flow with a recirculating circuit (CFCC), which allows assessment of cardiac function using a reduced perfusion volume while limiting adverse effects on the heart. Here, we provide evidence for cardiac parameters stability over time in this mode. Next, we demonstrate that our recycled ex vivo perfusion system and the traditional open one yield similar outputs on cardiac function under basal conditions and upon ?-adrenergic stimulation with isoproterenol. Subsequently, we validate the proof of concept of therapeutic agent screening using this efficient method. ?-blocker (i.e., propranolol) infusion in closed circulation countered the positive effects induced by isoproterenol stimulation on cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deflers et al. (2024) studied Healthy (animal model for cardiac drug screening). Constant-flow and closed circulation (CFCC) Langendorff perfusion vs. Constant-flow with open circulation (CFOC) was evaluated on Cardiac functional parameters (dLVP, dP/dtmax, dP/dtmin, HR, RPP). The constant-flow with closed circulation (CFCC) Langendorff perfusion method maintained stable cardiac parameters for 60 minutes and yielded similar outputs to the traditional open system.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: