Key result
Treated diabetic patients exhibited a similar infarct size compared to non-diabetic patients (14.5% vs 15.6% of left ventricle mass) one month after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Discrepancies exist between animal and human studies regarding the impact of diabetes on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion, hindering translation of cardioprotective drugs from bench to bedside.
Does metformin treatment or treated diabetes status affect myocardial infarct size and cell death following ischemia-reperfusion compared to non-diabetic or untreated diabetic states?
Cohort (n=250)
No
Does metformin treatment or treated diabetes status affect myocardial infarct size and cell death following ischemia-reperfusion compared to non-diabetic or untreated diabetic states?
Absolute Event Rate: 14.5% vs 15.6%
p-value: p=ns
Antidiabetic medications like metformin may confer cardioprotection during ischemia-reperfusion, explaining why treated diabetic STEMI patients do not exhibit larger infarct sizes than non-diabetics, highlighting the need to include standard medications in preclinical models.
In front of the failure to translate from bench to bedside cardioprotective drugs against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion, research scientists are currently revising their animal models. Owing to its growing incidence nowadays, type 2 diabetes (T2D) represents one of the main risk factors of co-morbidities in myocardial infarction. However, discrepancies exist between reported animal and human studies. Our aim was here to compare the impact of diabetes on cell death after cardiac ischemia-reperfusion in a human cohort of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with a diet-induced mouse model of T2D, using a high-fat high-sucrose diet for 16 weeks (HFHSD). Interestingly, a small fraction (<14%) of patients undergoing a myocardial infarct were diabetic, but treated, and did not show a bigger infarct size when compared to non-diabetic patients. On the contrary, HFHSD mice displayed an increased infarct size after an in vivo cardiac ischemia-reperfusion, together with an increased cell death after an in vitro hypoxia-reoxygenation on isolated cardiomyocytes. To mimic the diabetic patients' medication profile, 6 weeks of oral gavage with Metformin was performed in the HFHSD mouse group. Metformin treatment of the HFHSD mice led to a similar extent of lower cell death after hypoxia-reoxygenation as in the standard diet group, compared to the HFHSD cardiomyocytes. Altogether, our data highlight that due to their potential protective effect, anti-diabetic medications should be included in pre-clinical study of cardioprotective approaches. Moreover, since diabetic patients represent only a minor fraction of the STEMI patients, diabetic animal models may not be the most suitable translatable model to humans, unlike aging that appears as a common feature of all infarcted patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dia et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=250). Type 2 Diabetes vs. Non-diabetic patients was evaluated on Infarct size as a percentage of the left ventricle mass assessed by MRI at one month post-MI (p=ns). Treated diabetic patients exhibited a similar infarct size compared to non-diabetic patients (14.5% vs 15.6% of left ventricle mass) one month after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: