Why the study?
Does the structure of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy influence adherence in young patients with essential hypertension?
Does the structure of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy influence adherence in young patients with essential hypertension?
In young patients with essential hypertension, overall adherence is low, but the use of fixed-dose combinations is associated with the highest adherence levels.
Fixed-dose combinations were associated with higher adherence in young essential hypertension patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Aim: To determine the indicators of adherence to drug therapy in young patients with arterial hypertension (АН) and the correlation between the indicators and therapy management.Materials and methods: The study enrolled 514 patients aged 25 to 45 years diagnosed with essential hypertension. We studied the structure of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy and adherence to treatment using the Moriski−Green test and the original questionnaire. The patients were distributed depending on the degree of blood pressure increase, administered treatment, age, economic factor, and drug source.Results: The adherence level by Moriski−Green test was 36.8%; according to the original questionnaire: high adherence level was 38.3%, incomplete adherence ― 33.7%, and poor adherence ― 28.0%. The monotherapy with ACE inhibitors predominated in the majority of cases; the fixed combinations were more typical for the treatment of the stage II AH, drug combinations ― for stage III AH. The highest therapy adherence was registered in patients with stage III AH receiving treatment with combinations of drugs in a single dosage form. The life quality of respondents and the drug source did not influence the adherence significantly.Conclusion: In young patients with arterial hypertension, some features of treatment structure determine the therapy adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuleutayeva et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: