Why the study?
Does an amlodipine-based regimen compared to an atenolol-based regimen improve left ventricular diastolic function and hypertrophy in hypertensive patients?
RCT (n=1,006)
randomized
Yes
Does an amlodipine-based regimen compared to an atenolol-based regimen improve left ventricular diastolic function and hypertrophy in hypertensive patients?
Despite regression of left ventricular mass, long-term antihypertensive treatment with atenolol/bendroflumethiazide leads to deterioration in diastolic function compared to amlodipine/perindopril, potentially explaining worse clinical outcomes with the former.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Amlodipine-based regimens preserve diastolic function better than atenolol-based ones in hypertension; challenges beta-blocker preference and extends evidence beyond LV mass regression.
Antihypertensive treatment can improve tissue Doppler indices of left ventricular diastolic function in the short term, but little is known about the longer-term effect of different antihypertensive treatments on progression of left ventricular diastolic function and left ventricular hypertrophy. We hypothesized that long-term treatment of hypertension will lead to improvements in left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function. We collected detailed cardiovascular phenotypic data on 1006 participants from a substudy of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial. Patients randomized to either an amlodipine±perindopril-based or an atenolol±bendroflumethiazide-based regimen underwent conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography at time of control of blood pressure after randomization (≈1.5 years; phase 1) and after a further 2 years of antihypertensive treatment (phase 2). There were no prerandomization data. Five hundred thirty-six patients had complete data collection at both phases. Left ventricular mass index regressed from phase 1 to 2 with no significant difference between treatment groups (amlodipine: 119.5-116.8; atenolol: 122.9-117.5; P<0.001 for both). Conversely, tissue Doppler diastolic indices did not change in the amlodipine±perindopril-based regimen (E/e', 7.5-7.6 cm/s; P=not significant), but deteriorated in the atenolol±bendroflumethiazide-based regimen (E/e', 8.0-8.5 cm/s; P<0.01). Despite regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, there was no associated improvement in diastolic function. In fact, long-term treatment with atenolol±bendroflumethiazide resulted in a progressive deterioration in E/e'. This may be a factor contributing to the previously described worse clinical outcome in patients treated with atenolol±bendroflumethiazide compared with amlodipine±perindopril.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barron et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=1,006). Amlodipine±perindopril-based regimen vs. Atenolol±bendroflumethiazide-based regimen was evaluated on Left ventricular mass index and tissue Doppler diastolic indices (E/e').
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: