Why the study?
Do changes in QT dispersion following treatment with dofetilide predict all-cause or cardiac mortality in patients with congestive heart failure?
Do changes in QT dispersion following treatment with dofetilide predict all-cause or cardiac mortality in patients with congestive heart failure?
In patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular systolic function, dofetilide-induced changes in QT dispersion are small and do not predict mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QT dispersion changes need not alter dofetilide management in HF; challenges its value as a mortality predictor.
AIMS: Drug-induced changes in QT dispersion may be a way of detecting harmful repolarisation abnormalities for patients receiving antiarrhythmic drugs affecting ventricular repolarisation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 463 congestive heart failure (CHF) patients enrolled in the Danish Investigations Of Arrhythmia and Mortality On Dofetilide-CHF (DIAMOND-CHF) study, both pre-treatment and on-treatment day 2-6 QT dispersion was available from standard 12-lead ECGs. Patients were randomised in a double-blind manner to receive either placebo or dofetilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic drug. During a median follow-up of 19 months (minimum 1 year), 179 patients (39%) died (135 patients from cardiac causes). Changes in QT dispersion did not predict all-cause or cardiac mortality for patients treated with dofetilide in multivariate survival analysis (Risk ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.08, P>0.4). This finding was independent of pre-treatment QT dispersion. Dofetilide caused a small QT dispersion increment of 8 ms, not different from the changes seen in the placebo group (3 ms). CONCLUSION: For patients with CHF and reduced left ventricular systolic function, changes in QT dispersion following treatment with dofetilide do not predict all-cause or cardiac mortality. The dofetilide-induced QT dispersion changes are small and comparable to those seen in placebo treated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brendorp et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: