Key result
The incremental shuttle walk test elicited greater predicted maximal heart rate, blood pressure, and longer distance than the walking distance test in metabolic syndrome.
Why the study?
Field tests are practical and valid for assessing exercise capacity, but physiological responses and exercise performance needed comparison between two field tests in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Does the incremental shuttle walk test elicit different physiological responses and exercise performance compared to the six-minute walk test in patients with metabolic syndrome?
Cross-Sectional (n=47)
Does the incremental shuttle walk test elicit different physiological responses and exercise performance compared to the six-minute walk test in patients with metabolic syndrome?
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose Field tests are popular for assessing exercise capacity because they are practical and have established validity. The objective of this study was to compare physiological responses and exercise performance of patients with metabolic syndrome in two field tests of exercise capacity.Material and Methods Forty-seven patients diagnosed with metabolic syndrome participated in this cross-sectional study. Exercise capacity was assessed using incremental shuttle walk test and six-minute walk test. Factors determining exercise capacity and agreement between the two tests were also investigated.Results Metabolic syndrome patients achieved a significantly greater percentage of predicted maximal heart rate, blood pressure, and longer distance in the incremental shuttle walk test than in the six-minute walk test (p < 0.001). Gender and body mass index explained 48.5% of the variance in six-minute walk test distance (R = 0.697, R2 = 0.485, F(2-46) = 20.737, p < 0.001). Body mass index and fat-free mass explained 55% of the variance in incremental shuttle walk test distance (R = 0.746, R2= 0.557, F(2-46) = 27.623, p < 0.001).Conclusions Despite the agreement in the percentages of predicted maximal heart rate during these two field tests, the incremental shuttle walk test may be a better assessment tool than the six-minute walk test because it elicits more pronounced and definitive physiological responses to exercise tolerance in patients with metabolic syndrome.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe incremental shuttle walk test can be used to evaluate exercise capacity in metabolic syndrome.The incremental shuttle walk test elicits greater physiological responses than the six-minute walk test.The incremental shuttle walk test may be preferable over the six-minute walk test in investigating exercise capacity.Both tests can guide and assist in the evaluation of this patient population in clinical practice.Body mass index affected distance in both exercise tests.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The incremental shuttle walk test elicits more pronounced physiological responses than the six-minute walk test, making it a potentially better tool for assessing exercise capacity in patients with metabolic syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bozdemir-Özel et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in metabolic syndrome (n=47). Incremental shuttle walk test vs. Six-minute walk test was evaluated on percentage of predicted maximal heart rate, blood pressure, and distance (p=<0.001). The incremental shuttle walk test elicited greater predicted maximal heart rate, blood pressure, and longer distance than the walking distance test in metabolic syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: