Key result
Baseline self-care difficulties (HR 2.39; 95% CI 1.17-4.86; P=0.01) and anxiety predicted worse 5-year survival in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Why the study?
Does quality of life measured by the EQ-5D questionnaire predict long-term mortality, clinical response, and reverse remodelling in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cohort (n=130)
Does quality of life measured by the EQ-5D questionnaire predict long-term mortality, clinical response, and reverse remodelling in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 2.39 (95% CI 1.17–4.86)
p-value: p=0.01
The EQ-5D questionnaire is a simple tool that can predict long-term mortality, clinical response, and reverse remodelling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Aims: There are previous studies on quality of life (QoL) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients; however, there are no data with the short EuroQol-five dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire predicting outcomes. We aimed to assess the predictive role of baseline QoL and QoL change at 6 months after CRT with EQ-5D on 5-year mortality and response. Methods and results: In our prospective follow-up study, 130 heart failure (HF) patients undergoing CRT were enrolled. Clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and EQ-5D were performed at baseline and at 6 months of follow-up, continued to 5 years. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 5 years. Secondary endpoints were (i) clinical response with at least one class improvement in New York Heart Association without HF hospitalization and (ii) reverse remodelling with 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months. Fifty-four (41.5%) patients died during 5 years, 85 (65.3%) clinical responders were identified, and 63 patients (48.5%) had reverse remodelling. Baseline issues with mobility were associated with lower response [odds ratio (OR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-0.84; P = 0.018]. Lack of reverse remodelling correlated with self-care issues at baseline (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.94; P = 0.04). Furthermore, self-care difficulties [hazard ratio (HR) 2.39, 95% CI 1.17-4.86; P = 0.01) or more anxiety (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.00-2.26; P = 0.04) predicted worse long-term survival. At 6 months, mobility (HR 3.95, 95% CI 1.89-8.20; P < 0.001), self-care (HR 7.69, 95% CI 2.23-25.9; P = 0.001), or ≥ 10% visual analogue scale (VAS) (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.27-3.94; P = 0.005) improvement anticipated better survival at 5 years. Conclusion: EuroQol-five dimension is a simple method assessing QoL in CRT population. Mobility issues at baseline are associated with lower clinical response, whereas self-care issues predict lack of reverse remodelling. Problems with mobility or anxiety before CRT and persistent issues with mobility, self-care, and VAS scale at 6 months predict adverse outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagy et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=130). Baseline and 6-month quality of life issues (EQ-5D) vs. Patients without quality of life issues was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 5 years (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.17-4.86, p=0.01). Baseline self-care difficulties (HR 2.39; 95% CI 1.17-4.86; P=0.01) and anxiety predicted worse 5-year survival in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: