Why the study?
Does cardiac rehabilitation change causal attributions in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Does cardiac rehabilitation change causal attributions in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Patients' beliefs about the cause of their cardiac events remain relatively stable before and after cardiac rehabilitation, highlighting the need for tailored educational approaches.
Patients' causal attributions for CVD events remain stable after rehabilitation; leaves open whether tailored education can modify beliefs.
PURPOSE: This study examined temporal patterns in causal attributions generated by patients with cardiovascular disease before and after cardiac rehabilitation (CR). DESIGN: Qualitative, descriptive survey. METHODS: Eighty-six participants were asked what they believed was the primary cause of their cardiac events. Cardiac attributions were collected at the beginning of CR, at the end of CR, and 15 months after baseline. FINDINGS: Content analyses showed that heredity and behavior were the most commonly generated causes. Most participants showed stability in attributions over time, although we found a trend for more participants endorsing behavioral attributions at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac attributions remain relatively stable across time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cardiac rehabilitation staff should approach patients differently, depending on their causal narratives. Some patients enter CR understanding that behavior played a causal role, whereas some do not. Encouraging appreciation of the importance of behavior in cardiovascular disease onset and recurrence is vital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennett et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: