Why the study?
Does a preintubation dose of lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol prevent tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery?
Does a preintubation dose of lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol prevent tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery?
Esmolol 150 mg provides consistent and reliable protection against both tachycardia and hypertension during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, whereas lidocaine and fentanyl only protect against hypertension.
Esmolol 150 mg should be preferred to blunt intubation tachycardia and hypertension; extends comparative RCT data versus lidocaine or fentanyl in noncardiac surgery.
Eighty patients, ASA physical status II-IV, scheduled for noncardiac surgery, were randomly assigned in a double-blind, placebo-controlled manner to receive a preintubation dose of either placebo, 200 mg lidocaine, 200 micrograms fentanyl, or 150 mg esmolol. Induction of anesthesia was accomplished with 4-6 mg/kg thiopental IV followed immediately by the study drug; 1-1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine was given at minute 1. Laryngoscopy and intubation were performed at minute 2 with anesthesia thereafter maintained with 1 MAC (+/- 10%) isoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen at a 5 L/min flow for 10 min. Heart rate was recorded every 15 s and blood pressure every minute from induction until 10 min after intubation. Maximum percent increases in heart rate (mean +/- SE) during and after intubation were similar in the placebo (44% +/- 6%), lidocaine (51% +/- 10%), and fentanyl (37% +/- 5%) groups, but lower in the esmolol (18% +/- 5%) group (P less than 0.05). Maximum systolic blood pressure percent increases were lower in the lidocaine (20% +/- 6%), fentanyl (12% +/- 3%), and esmolol (19% +/- 4%) groups than in the placebo (36% +/- 5%) group (P less than 0.05), but not different from each other (P greater than 0.05). Only esmolol provided consistent and reliable protection against increases in both heart rate and systolic blood pressure accompanying laryngoscopy and intubation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helfman et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: