Why the study?
Does non-invasive cardiac output measurement accurately estimate cardiac output compared to a pulmonary artery catheter in patients undergoing repeat hip surgery?
Does non-invasive cardiac output measurement accurately estimate cardiac output compared to a pulmonary artery catheter in patients undergoing repeat hip surgery?
Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring slightly underestimates cardiac output compared to a pulmonary artery catheter but shows significant correlation during repeat hip surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support NICO-PAC correlation in repeat hip surgery; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare cardiac output measurements of the non-invasive cardiac output and the pulmonary artery catheter during repeat surgery for hip replacement. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, patients undergoing repeat hip surgery who needed a pulmonary artery catheter were included. A standard protocol was followed for induction, endotracheal intubation and maintenance of anaesthesia (sufentanil, etomidate, sevoflurane, cisatracurium). After endotracheal intubation, the non-invasive cardiac output was connected and a pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. Data were collected every 3 min until patients were extubated. RESULTS: Ten patients were included and 2455 points of comparison recorded. Cardiac output from the pulmonary artery catheter varied from 1.7 to 8.9 L min(-1) (mean 4.1 L min(-1)) and the non-invasive cardiac output (using averaging mode) from 1.7 to 8.0 L min(-1) (mean 3.7 L min(-1)). There was a significant correlation between them (P < 0.01; bias 0.3 L min(-1); limits of agreement +1.9 and -2.5 L min(-1)), although these differed between patients. CONCLUSION: The perioperative bias was small and the non-invasive cardiac output slightly underestimated cardiac output intraoperatively compared to the pulmonary artery catheter. The bias was smaller when mean cardiac output was below 3 L min(-1). Core temperature between 34.4 degrees C and 37.6 degrees C had no influence on the differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guéret et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: