Why the study?
Does Transesophageal Doppler (TED) monitoring accurately predict cardiac output during hemorrhage and resuscitation compared to pulmonary artery blood flow and intermittent bolus cardiac output in an anesthetized dog model?
Does Transesophageal Doppler (TED) monitoring accurately predict cardiac output during hemorrhage and resuscitation compared to pulmonary artery blood flow and intermittent bolus cardiac output in an anesthetized dog model?
Transesophageal Doppler monitoring accurately reflects the direction and magnitude of cardiac output changes during abrupt hemodynamic shifts in an experimental hemorrhage model, despite overestimating absolute values.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TED tracks directional CO changes during canine hemorrhage despite absolute overestimation; leaves open human resuscitation applicability.
Transesophageal Doppler (TED) monitoring has been considered a noninvasive and accurate alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization for volume replacement and cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing major surgery. This study tested the hypothesis that TED can accurately predict cardiac output during hemorrhage, shock, and resuscitation, by comparing it to total pulmonary artery blood flow (PABF) and to standard intermittent bolus cardiac output (ICO). In eight anesthetized dogs (18 +/- 1.0 kg), PABF was measured with an ultrasonic flowprobe while ICO and mixed venous O2 saturation (SvO2) were measured through a Swan-Ganz catheter. A TED probe (CardioQ, Deltex Medical Inc., Irving, TX, U.S.A.), designed for adult use (minimum 30 kg, 16 years), was placed in midesophageous to evaluate stroke volume. A graded hemorrhage (20 mL/min) was produced (H5-H35) to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 mm Hg and maintained by additional blood removal for 30 min (S1-S30). Total shed blood volume was retransfused (541 +/- 54.2 mL) over 30 min (T5-T30), after which a massive hemorrhage, 100 mL/min rate, was produced over 10 min (MH5-MH10). In general, TED overestimated PABF (r2 = 0.3472), but changes in TED paralleled PABF throughout the experimental protocol, particularly during massive hemorrhage (r2 = 0.9001). We concluded that TED accurately reflected the direction and magnitude of the changes of cardiac output over time during abrupt hemodynamic changes. Probes designed for lower weights and smaller aortas may improve its accuracy in medium size animal models under less dramatic alterations induced by hemorrhage, shock, and resuscitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Figueiredo et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: