Why the study?
Ganglionated plexus ablation is used to treat AF and vasovagal syncope, but its comparative effects in treating PAF and VVS have not been well studied.
What are the comparative effects and clinical outcomes of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation versus vasovagal syncope?
What are the comparative effects and clinical outcomes of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation versus vasovagal syncope?
Anatomically guided intensive ganglionated plexus ablation is highly effective for both paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope, with VVS patients exhibiting a higher rate of vasovagal response during ablation.
Suggests intensive ganglionated plexus ablation may offer differential autonomic benefits in paroxysmal.
BACKGROUND: Ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation is used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) and vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the comparative effects of GP ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and VVS have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intensive GP ablation on PAF and VVS. METHODS: PAF and VVS patients were enrolled in this study. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in the PAF group, and additional ablation was performed at GP sites. Anatomic ablation of left atrial GPs was performed in the VVS group. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or other sustained atrial tachycardia and syncope recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were enrolled: 146 patients with PAF, including eight patients with combined VVS (PAF group), and 49 patients with VVS (VVS group). Vasovagal response (VR) was achieved in 78 (53.4%) patients in the PAF group and 48 patients (98.0%) in the VVS group (P < .05). During the 17.8 ± 10.5 (range, 3-42) month follow-up, 126 (86.3%) patients were free of AF in the PAF group, and 45 (91.8%) patients in the VVS group had no syncope recurrence and significantly improved symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomically guided intensive GP ablation showed efficient clinical outcomes for both groups of patients. Compared with PAF patients, VVS patients had more VR during ablation in the left atrium. Furthermore, VR during ablation indicated a better prognosis in PAF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: