Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of ganglionated plexus ablation of the left atrium for patients with refractory vasovagal syncope needed investigation.
Does ganglionated plexus ablation of the left atrium reduce syncope recurrence in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope?
Does ganglionated plexus ablation of the left atrium reduce syncope recurrence in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope?
Ganglionated plexus ablation of the left atrium appears safe and effectively reduces syncope recurrence in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope.
May support left-atrial GP ablation in selected refractory VVS; leaves open RCT confirmation and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of ganglionated plexus ablation of the left atrium for patients with refractory vasovagal syncope. METHODS: From May 2019 to December 2023, 39 patients with refractory vasovagal syncope (VVS) underwent ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation at our institution. Associations between post-ablation VVS recurrence and factors including average heart rate on Holter monitoring, preoperative head-up tilt table test (HUTT), for GP identification methods, and sex were analyzed. RESULTS: During the follow-up period 18.7 months, 30 of the 39 patients (76.9 % vs 23.1 %, p = 0.001) were symptom-free after GP ablation. The remaining 9 patients exhibited significant symptomatic improvement, with a marked reduction in the number of syncopal episodes (2.11 ± 1.27 vs 7.13 ± 3.57, p = 0.00). The mean heart rate after procedure (87.10 ± 11.22 bpm) was significantly higher than pre-procedures (70.33 ± 7.56 bpm, p = 0.00), indicating effective VVS control. Preoperative HUTT classifications and GP localization methods showed no significant association with recurrence, although female sex was associated with a higher likelihood of recurrent VVS. No procedure-related complication occurred. CONCLUSION: GP ablation of the left atrium is a safe and effective treatment for patients with refractory vasovagal syncope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: