Why the study?
Does a hybrid ICPPG system accurately estimate pulse transit time and correlate with blood pressure variations in human subjects?
Does a hybrid ICPPG system accurately estimate pulse transit time and correlate with blood pressure variations in human subjects?
A novel hybrid contact and imaging PPG system demonstrates feasibility in estimating pulse transit time and correlating with blood pressure variations, paving the way for unobtrusive wearable BP monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical meaning/caution now): Demonstrates early feasibility for unobtrusive wearable blood pressure monitoring but should.
Blood pressure (BP) is critical in diagnosing certain cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension. Some previous studies have proved that BP can be estimated by pulse transit time (PTT) calculated by a pair of photoplethysmography (PPG) signals at two body sites. Currently, contact PPG (cPPG) and imaging PPG (iPPG) are two feasible ways to obtain PPG signals. In this study, we proposed a hybrid system (called the ICPPG system) employing both methods that can be implemented on a wearable device, facilitating the measurement of BP in an inconspicuous way. The feasibility of the ICPPG system was validated on a dataset with 29 subjects. It has been proved that the ICPPG system is able to estimate PTT values. Moreover, the PTT measured by the new system shows a correlation on average with BP variations for most subjects, which could facilitate a new generation of BP measurement using wearable and mobile devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: