Key result
A novel camera-based health monitoring system achieved correlations of 0.807 to 0.906 for heart rate and 0.64 to 0.94 for systolic blood pressure compared to a commercial monitor.
Why the study?
Current blood pressure measuring methods require inflatable cuffs or contact sensors that limit normal activities, highlighting the need for a robust, non-contact, continuous, and portable monitoring approach.
Does a camera-based health monitoring system using facial videos accurately estimate heart rate and blood pressure compared to a commercial monitor?
Does a camera-based health monitoring system using facial videos accurately estimate heart rate and blood pressure compared to a commercial monitor?
Effect estimate: Correlation 0.64 to 0.94 for systolic BP
A novel camera-based system using facial video from mobile devices showed moderate to high correlation with commercial monitors for estimating heart rate and systolic blood pressure in a small pilot study.
Hypothesis-generating for contactless monitoring; prospective validation required before clinical adoption.
Blood pressure (BP), as one of the primary vital signs, is of great importance to help assess an individual's health conditions. Abnormal BP levels may provide clues to, or even induce, some life-threatening severe complications, such as heart attack, stroke, kidney disease, etc. Current BP measuring methods usually require the wearing of either an inflatable cuff or some contact sensors, which may limit the subject's normal activities and greatly impact the user's experience. We therefore aim to investigate a robust, non-contact, continuous and portable blood pressure and heart rate (HR) monitoring approach that features great usability and convenience for everyday use scenarios. To this end, in this paper, we propose a novel camera-based health monitoring system towards continuous BP and HR measurements based on pulse transit time (PTT) estimation and PPG extraction from facial regions. Our algorithm adapts the Laplacian pyramid based image processing technique to detect and capture the subtle changes caused by cardiac activities. To evaluate the usability and robustness of the proposed system, we conducted a pilot study with 4 subjects using the facial videos recorded from various mobile devices with different video recording positions. Specifically, compared with the reference readings acquired from a commercial blood pressure monitor, our system achieves the correlations in the range of 0.807 to 0.906 for HR estimation, and in the range of 0.64 to 0.94 for PTT estimates and systolic BP. It has been shown that the proposed system can provide accurate PTT estimations using regular mobile devices, which can be potentially used for non-intrusive continuous BP monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patil et al. (2019) studied Blood pressure and heart rate monitoring (n=4). Camera-based health monitoring system vs. Commercial blood pressure monitor was evaluated on Correlation of heart rate estimation and systolic blood pressure with reference readings (Correlation 0.64 to 0.94 for systolic BP). A novel camera-based health monitoring system achieved correlations of 0.807 to 0.906 for heart rate and 0.64 to 0.94 for systolic blood pressure compared to a commercial monitor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: