Why the study?
Elevated HbA1c is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, but the association with earlier insulin resistance markers is poorly understood.
Does higher HOMA-IR associate with increased subclinical atherosclerosis in normoglycemic individuals without known cardiovascular disease?
Does higher HOMA-IR associate with increased subclinical atherosclerosis in normoglycemic individuals without known cardiovascular disease?
HOMA-IR identifies low-risk, normoglycemic individuals with a higher burden of subclinical atherosclerosis, suggesting its utility for earlier primary cardiovascular prevention.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open HOMA-IR for residual SA risk stratification in low-risk, normoglycemic adults.
BACKGROUND: Elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is associated with a higher burden of subclinical atherosclerosis (SA). However, the association with SA of earlier insulin resistance markers is poorly understood. The study assessed the association between the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) and SA in addition to the effect of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in individuals with normal HbA1c. METHODS: A cohort of 3,741 middle-aged individuals from the Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis (PESA) study with basal HbA1c < 6.0% (< 42 mmol/mol) and no known CV disease underwent extensive imaging (multiterritorial vascular ultrasound and coronary artery calcium score, CACS) to assess the presence, burden, and extent of SA. RESULTS: Individuals with higher HOMA-IR values had higher rates of CVRFs. HOMA-IR showed a direct association with the multiterritorial extent of SA and CACS (p < 0.001) and with global plaque volume measured by 3-dimensional vascular ultrasound (p < 0.001). After adjusting for key CVRFs and HbA1c, HOMA-IR values ≥ 3 were associated with both the multiterritorial extent of SA (odds ratio 1.41; 95%CI: 1.01 to 1.95, p = 0.041) and CACS > 0 (odds ratio 1.74; 95%CI: 1.20 to 2.54, p = 0.004), as compared with the HOMA-IR < 2 (the reference HOMA-IR category). In a stratified analysis, this association remained significant in individuals with a low-to-moderate SCORE2 risk estimate (75.6% of the cohort) but not in high-risk individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HOMA-IR identified low-risk individuals with a higher burden of SA, after adjusting for the effects of key traditional CVRFs and HbA1c. HOMA-IR is a simple measure that could facilitate earlier implementation of primary CV prevention strategies in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iglésies et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: