Why the study?
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake correlate with histological inflammation in patients with ≥70% carotid stenosis?
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake correlate with histological inflammation in patients with ≥70% carotid stenosis?
18F-FDG PET/CT uptake reflects inflammatory status in large stenotic carotid plaques, and complex background correction methods do not significantly improve this correlation.
Supports 18F-FDG PET/CT for carotid plaque inflammation assessment; leaves open optimal quantification methods for validation.
There is currently no consensus on the methodology for quantification of 18 F-FDG uptake in inflammation in atherosclerosis. In this study, we explore different methods for quantification of 18 F-FDG uptake in carotid atherosclerotic plaques and correlate the uptake values to histological assessments of inflammation. Forty-four patients with atherosclerotic stenosis ≥70% of the internal carotid artery underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV max ) from all plaque-containing slices were collected. SUV max for the single highest and the mean of multiple slices with and without blood background correction (by subtraction (cSUV) or by division (target-to-background ratio (TBR)) were calculated. Following endarterectomy 30 plaques were assessed histologically. The length of the plaques at CT was 6-32 mm. The 18 F-FDG uptake in the plaques was 1.15-2.66 for uncorrected SUVs, 1.16-3.19 for TBRs, and 0.20-1.79 for cSUVs. There were significant correlations between the different uptake values ( r = 0.57-0.99, P < 0.001). Methods with and without blood background correction showed similar, moderate correlations to the amount of inflammation assessed at histology ( r = 0.44-0.59, P < 0.02). In large stenotic carotid plaques, 18 F-FDG uptake reflects the inflammatory status as assessed at histology. Increasing number of PET slices or background correction did not change the correlation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnsrud et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: