Why the study?
Does an n-of-1 trial approach with repeated ABPM help identify the most effective and tolerable antihypertensive medication in children?
Does an n-of-1 trial approach with repeated ABPM help identify the most effective and tolerable antihypertensive medication in children?
n-of-1 trials using repeated ABPM can effectively individualize antihypertensive therapy in children, with lisinopril being the most frequently preferred agent.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports n-of-1 ABPM trials for individualizing pediatric antihypertensive therapy; extends personalized approaches beyond standard RCTs.
The medication producing the greatest blood pressure reduction, and without unacceptable side effects, was selected as the preferred therapy for the individual. RESULTS: Forty-two children agreed to participate; 7 were normotensive without medication; and 3 failed to complete one treatment cycle. Of the remaining 32 patients, lisinopril was preferred for 16, amlodipine for 8, hydrochlorothiazide for 4, and 4 had uncontrolled blood pressure on maximum doses of monotherapy. In conservative Bayesian analyses, the proportion of patients who preferred lisinopril was 49% (95% credible interval [CrI]: 32% to 69%), 24% (95% CrI: 12% to 41%) preferred amlodipine, and 12% (95% CrI: 4% to 26%) preferred hydrochlorothiazide. The preferred therapy for the majority (67%) of African American participants was lisinopril. Unacceptable side effects were reported in 24% of assessments for hydrochlorothiazide, 16% for lisinopril, and 13% for amlodipine. CONCLUSIONS: of-1 trials with repeated ABPM may promote better informed and individualized decisions in pediatric hypertension management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuel et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: