Why the study?
Does a CNN-based model accurately predict T:R ratios from 10-second ECG segments to assess eligibility for S-ICD implantation?
Does a CNN-based model accurately predict T:R ratios from 10-second ECG segments to assess eligibility for S-ICD implantation?
A novel deep learning tool can automatically predict T:R ratios from ECGs, potentially improving the reliability of screening patients for S-ICD eligibility by avoiding T wave oversensing issues.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change 10-s S-ICD screening; leaves open whether prolonged AI T:R tracking reduces inappropriate shocks.
Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (S-ICDs) are used for prevention of sudden cardiac death triggered by ventricular arrhythmias. T Wave Over Sensing (TWOS) is an inherent risk with S-ICDs which can lead to inappropriate shocks. A major predictor of TWOS is a high T:R ratio (the ratio between the amplitudes of the T and R waves). Currently, patients' Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are screened over 10 s to measure the T:R ratio to determine the patients' eligibility for S-ICD implantation. Due to temporal variations in the T:R ratio, 10 s is not a long enough window to reliably determine the normal values of a patient's T:R ratio. In this paper, we develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) based model utilising phase space reconstruction matrices to predict T:R ratios from 10-second ECG segments without explicitly locating the R or T waves, thus avoiding the issue of TWOS. This tool can be used to automatically screen patients over a much longer period and provide an in-depth description of the behavior of the T:R ratio over that period. The tool can also enable much more reliable and descriptive screenings to better assess patients' eligibility for S-ICD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dunn et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: