Why the study?
Transtricuspid CIEDs complicate the management of tricuspid regurgitation, and real-world evidence evaluating the safety and efficacy of transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty in CIED carriers is limited.
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TTVA) achieve comparable intraprocedural success and safety in CIED carriers compared to non-CIED carriers with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation?
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TTVA) achieve comparable intraprocedural success and safety in CIED carriers compared to non-CIED carriers with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation?
Transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty is a safe and effective treatment for severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients with trans-tricuspid pacemaker or defibrillator leads, yielding comparable procedural success to non-CIED patients.
May support TTVA consideration in CIED carriers with severe TR; leaves open prospective trials to confirm durability.
BACKGROUND: Transtricuspid cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) complicate the management of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TTVA) offers a promising approach due to minimal interaction with leaflets and transvalvular CIEDs, though real-world evidence is limited. METHODS: This bi-center, retrospective study includes 204 consecutive patients who underwent TTVA with the Cardioband (Edwards Lifesciences) for severe symptomatic TR. Patients were divided into CIED carriers and non-CIED carriers. CIED carriers were further classified into those with lead-associated TR (LTR-A) and those with TR unrelated to CIED leads (LTR-B). RESULTS: Among the 204 patients, 41 (20%) were CIED carriers. Of these, 24% had mixed TR etiology (functional and LTR-A), while 76% had predominantly functional TR (LTR-B). Compared to non-CIED-carriers, CIED carriers were more symptomatic (NYHA-FC > II; 93% vs. 89%; p = 0.026) with comparable TR severity at baseline. Intraprocedural success according to the Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium was 68% in CIED carriers and 70% in non-CIED carriers (p = 0.851). LTR-A was associated with poorer TR reduction immediately after TTVA (p = 0.022). Overall safety was comparable, with right ventricular lead dislodgement occurring in one patient. Beyond that, CIED function remained unimpaired. At 30 days, echocardiographic follow-up showed comparable TR reduction (TR ≤ II: 56% vs. 68%; p = 0.219) and NYHA-FU ≤ II (63% vs. 70%; p = 0.524) in CIED-and non-CIED carriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TTVA achieves significant TR reduction, providing a safe and effective therapeutic option for TR treatment in CIED carriers. WHAT IS KNOWN?: TTVA using the Cardioband has been approved for severe, symptomatic TR patients, however data on the safety and efficacy in CIED carriers is lacking. WHAT THE STUDY ADDS?: Intraprocedural success and safety were comparable in CIED and non-CIED carriers treated with TTVA. Subgroup analyses showed a trend towards worse outcome and efficiency of TTVA in patients with LTR-A. Postinterventional CIED interrogations did not show critical technical issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wrobel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: