Why the study?
Does carotid artery stenting under protection device improve neurological outcomes compared to medical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis > 60%?
Does carotid artery stenting under protection device improve neurological outcomes compared to medical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis > 60%?
Carotid artery stenting with a protection device significantly reduces the risk of TIA and stroke at 6 months compared to medical therapy alone in patients with >60% carotid stenosis.
Background:Carotid artery stenting (CAS)has become widely available and considered as an alternative to carotid endartectomy .Objective: To compare CAS under protection device with medical treatment. Material and method: fifty patients were enrolled in these study (30 patients treated with carotid stenting and 20 patients managed medically) with stenosis > 60%.with follow up at six months later clinically and radiologically using carotid duplex .Result:After 6 months 4(13.4%) patients in CAS group develop TIA while in medically treated group 6(30%) patients, 1(3.3%) patient in CAS group develop stroke which was after procedure while 6(30%) patients in medically treated group develop stroke during follow up within 6 months, 1(3.3%) patient die in CAS group due to myocardial infarction, while in medically treated group 2(10%) patients died one of them due to large stroke and the other due to myocardial infarction. There was high significant difference between CAS and medical treated group after 6 months (p<0.01).Conclusion: CAS under protection device is associated with better outcome than medical treatment.Â
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egila et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: