Why the study?
Does implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation improve survival and manage arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias?
Does implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation improve survival and manage arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias?
ICD implantation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and malignant arrhythmias is highly effective for survival but complicated by frequent appropriate and inappropriate shocks.
Supports ICD survival in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia but cautions on frequent inappropriate shocks; leaves open randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: To study the outcome of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for ventricular tachyarrhythmias complicated by haemodynamic collapse. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Nine consecutive patients (eight male, one female; mean (SD) age, 36 (18) years) with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia presenting with ventricular tachycardia and haemodynamic collapse (n = 6) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 3), treated with an ICD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival; numbers of and reasons for appropriate and inappropriate ICD interventions. RESULTS: After a mean (SD) follow up of 32 (24) months, all patients were alive. Six patients received a median of 19 (range 2-306) appropriate ICD interventions for events detected in the ventricular tachycardia window; four received a median of 2 (range 1-19) appropriate ICD interventions for events detected in the ventricular fibrillation window. Inappropriate interventions were seen for sinus tachycardia (18 episodes in three patients), atrial fibrillation (three episodes in one patient), and for non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (one episode in one patient). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and malignant ventricular arrhythmias have a high recurrence rate requiring appropriate ICD interventions, but they also often have inappropriate interventions. Programming the device is difficult because this population develops supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias with similar rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
René Tavernier (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: