This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose: To compare image quality (IQ) between deep learning (DL)-accelerated magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and conventional MRE in patients with Crohn's disease.Materials and Methods: From August 2023 to July 2024, we retrospectively reviewed two patient cohorts who underwent MRE using either conventional or DL-accelerated sequences.Two radiologists independently evaluated the overall IQ, sharpness, motion artifacts, and artificial appearance for single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE), diffusionweighted imaging (DWI), and precontrast and dynamic phases.Results: A total of 39 patients were included (median age, 31.0 years; conventional group, n = 15; DL group, n = 24).The mean overall IQ scores were 4.27 ± 0.70 (conventional coronal SSFSE) and 4.79 ± 0.41 (DL coronal SSFSE, p = 0.028), 3.00 ± 0.65 (conventional DWI) and 3.92 ± 0.65 (DL DWI, p = 0.001), and 3.60 ± 1.06 (conventional arterial-phase T1-weighted imaging [T1WI]) and 4.33 ± 0.70 (DL arterial-phase T1WI, p = 0.044).The DL group demonstrated higher overall IQ than the conventional group across all sequences.None of the examinations were classified as nondiagnostic (overall IQ <2) in either group.Across all phases, the DL group exhibited fewer motion artifacts but a more artificial appearance than the conventional group.Conclusion: DL-MRE achieved adequate IQ in patients with Crohn's disease while reducing scan time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: