Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ozone (O 3 ) pollution is increasingly recognized as a serious environmental threat associated with elevated dementia risks. However, evidence regarding the impact of prenatal exposure to O 3 on the morphological development of the brain remains limited. This nationwide population-based study investigated associations between prenatal O 3 exposure and brain volume in 3294 infants aged 0–1 year without major anomalies, who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for non-neurological indications at hospitals within the China Neonatal Neuro-Critical Care Network group. Prenatal O 3 exposure was estimated using geocoded residential addresses linked to 1 km × 1 km air pollution datasets. Linear mixed-effects models revealed that each 10 μg/m 3 increase in prenatal O 3 exposure was associated with a decrease of 1.14% (95% CI: 0.38–1.88) in total brain volume, 1.15% (95% CI: 0.40–1.89) in gray matter volume, 1.13% (95% CI: 0.37–1.88) in white matter volume, 1.11% (95% CI: 0.35–1.87) in cerebral blood volume, and 1.12% (95% CI: 0.36–1.88) in cerebrospinal fluid. No significant association was observed for the apparent diffusion coefficient [−0.08% (95% CI: −0.43–0.27)]. The associations remained significant in dual-pollutant models that additionally adjusted for prenatal PM 2.5 exposure. Mediation analysis confirmed a direct effect of prenatal O 3 exposure on brain morphology, as birth weight accounted for only 3.47% to 3.54% of the total effect. Our findings underscore the imperative for stricter air quality regulations to protect pregnant individuals and mitigate potential neurodevelopmental impairment originating as early as the fetal stage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: