Qualitative study uncovers non-linear identity reconstruction during recovery from co-occurring bulimia nervosa and borderline personality disorder, highlighting the need for trauma-informed care.
Background Co-occurring Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) affect a substantial population in the United Kingdom. This study explored how individuals experience recovery from these conditions, with a focus on interpreting how individuals with such experiences make sense of themselves. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve individuals with lived experience of recovery from BN and BPD. Data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Results Three superordinate themes were identified: (1) Ambivalence around recovery, reflecting conflicting messages from care systems; (2) Controlled chaos and support, capturing emotional volatility, relational instability, and the non-linear nature of recovery; and (3) Identity, stigma, and the search for self, highlighting developing self-compassion, agency, and identity shifts. Recovery was described as an evolving, relational process shaped by ambivalence and self-redefinition. Therapeutic trust and authentic connection facilitated recovery, while invalidating environments, trauma, and service limitations acted as barriers. Conclusions Recovery from co-occurring BN and BPD is a complex, relational process involving identity reconstruction and emotional integration. Findings suggest that recovery-oriented services should prioritise compassionate, trauma-informed, and relationally attuned care, with particular attention to reducing diagnostic stigma, fostering collaborative therapeutic relationships, and supporting the development of a meaningful sense of self beyond illness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: