Key result
Remote lifestyle interventions improve diet quality and physical activity levels in cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Long-term management of CVDs requires comprehensive rehabilitation, and digital technologies have emerged as promising approaches to facilitate lifestyle changes such as diet and physical activity.
Do remotely delivered nutrition interventions with or without physical activity interventions improve lifestyle behaviors, clinical biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes in adults with cardiovascular diseases?
Systematic Review (n=2,912)
Do remotely delivered nutrition interventions with or without physical activity interventions improve lifestyle behaviors, clinical biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes in adults with cardiovascular diseases?
Remotely delivered nutrition and physical activity interventions are feasible and effective for improving diet quality, physical activity levels, and patient-reported outcomes in adults with cardiovascular diseases.
Supports remote nutrition and activity programs in CVD care; extends RCT evidence for scalable behavioral interventions.
Objective: The long-term management of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) requires comprehensive rehabilitation strategies aimed at optimizing functional recovery and promoting behavioral changes. These interventions may include digital technologies that emerged as promising approaches to facilitate lifestyle changes, such as dietary behavior and physical activity (PA). Aim: This review aimed to synthesize the current evidence for the potential impact of remotely delivered nutrition interventions with or without a combination of PA interventions on biochemical biomarkers, cardiovascular indexes, anthropometric parameters, levels of PA, exercise and functional capacity, adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD), diet quality and quality of life, rehospitalization, urgent visits, death and acute events in adults (≥18 years) with CVDs. Secondary outcomes were accessibility, safety, usability, and adherence. Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched up to 2026 for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in English, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The methodological quality was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of bias tool for RCTs (RoB2). Results: 11 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 66 to 879 participants. The duration of the interventions varied from 4 weeks to 12 months. The interventions were delivered remotely using a range of digital health technologies, including web-based programs, mobile phones, wearable devices, smartphone applications, and mini-apps. Favorable changes were observed in diet quality and in adherence to MD and PA levels, with no intervention-related adverse events reported. The RoB2 assessment indicated that the majority of included studies (6 out of 11) were classified as having some concerns regarding risk of bias. Conclusions: Remotely combined nutrition and PA interventions are a feasible and effective approach for improving mainly patient-reported outcomes in adults with CVDs. These findings support integrating remote multimodal rehabilitation into routine cardiovascular care and highlight the potential of telehealth-based models to enhance patients’ access to rehabilitation services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dimopoulou et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular diseases (n=2,912). Remotely delivered nutrition and physical activity interventions vs. Usual care or in-person interventions was evaluated on Biochemical biomarkers, cardiovascular indexes, anthropometric parameters, physical activity levels, diet quality, and clinical events. Remotely delivered nutrition and physical activity interventions improved diet quality, adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, and physical activity levels in adults with cardiovascular diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: