Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maximum likelihood and Bayesian procedures for item selection and scoring of multidimensional adaptive tests are presented. A demonstration using simulated response data illustrates that multidimensional adaptive testing (MAT) can provide equal or higher reliabilities with about one-third fewer items than are required by one-dimensional adaptive testing (OAT). Furthermore, holding test-length constant across the MAT and OAT approaches, substantial improvements in reliability can be obtained from multidimensional assessment. A number of issues relating to the operational use of multidimensional adaptive testing are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel O. Segall (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: