Why the study?
The authors sought to assess cardiovascular event rates, all-cause death, risk factors, treatment patterns, and outcomes of dual versus monotherapy in individuals qualifying for dual combination BP-lowering therapy.
Does dual combination blood pressure-lowering therapy reduce the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiovascular death compared to monotherapy in adults qualifying for dual therapy?
Does dual combination blood pressure-lowering therapy reduce the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiovascular death compared to monotherapy in adults qualifying for dual therapy?
In a large real-world cohort, treatment with dual antihypertensive therapy compared to monotherapy was associated with an 18% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular events, highlighting a substantial opportunity for risk reduction through treatment intensification.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed rates of cardiovascular events, all-cause death, baseline risk factors, and treatment patterns in a population qualifying for initiation of dual combination blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapy. We also evaluated the association between dual versus monotherapy during follow-up and incidence of cardiovascular events. METHODS: This study utilized integrated databases in England: Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Hospital Episode Statistics, and Office for National Statistics. Individuals aged at least 18 years qualifying for dual therapy were identified during 15-year period (2005-2019). The primary endpoint was composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiovascular death. The secondary endpoint was all-cause death. RESULTS: Total 1 426 079 individuals met selection criteria. The 15-year event rates for the primary and secondary endpoints were 27.1 and 32.6%, respectively. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes on insulin therapy, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, and advanced age were associated with two to four-fold higher risk of primary and secondary endpoints. The estimated hazard ratio for dual versus monotherapy as a time-varying covariate was 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.81-0.83) for the primary endpoint. At variance with guidelines, monotherapy was most common treatment pattern over 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Baseline characteristics conveying a multifold higher risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause death mostly represented nonmodifiable risk factors. Treatment with dual therapy as compared to monotherapy was associated with reduction in cardiovascular events. Monotherapy remained most common BP-lowering treatment indicating substantial opportunity for risk reduction by treatment intensification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coca et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: