Cross-sectional survey finds high burnout risk in anesthesiology specialists, highlighting the protective role of workplace support and regular social activity.
Burnout is a critical occupational issue in anesthesiology, with implications for physician well-being, patient safety, and workforce sustainability. Although burnout among anesthesiology specialists in Türkiye has been reported, national data interpreted through the current MBI-HSS profile-based framework remain scarce. We aimed to characterize burnout profiles among anesthesiology specialists in Türkiye and identify factors associated with an investigator-defined burnout risk profile. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional online survey in June 2025 among anesthesiology specialists reached through the Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation mailing list. The anonymous questionnaire collected demographic, occupational, psychosocial, and health-related data and included the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS-MP). Burnout was assessed using the MBI-HSS 4th edition profile approach. The investigator-defined burnout risk profile comprised the Burnout, Overextended, and Disengaged profiles; associated factors were examined using multivariable logistic regression, with two sensitivity analyses using alternative outcome definitions. A total of 193 anesthesiology specialists completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 21.0%. The mean age was 43.7 ± 8.6 years, and 116 participants (60.1%) were female. Using the MBI-HSS profile-based classification, we found that 47 participants (24.4%) met the Burnout profile, 61 (31.6%) were classified as Overextended, 9 (4.7%) as Disengaged, 54 (28.0%) as Ineffective, and 22 (11.4%) as Engaged. Overall, 117 respondents (60.6%; 95% CI: 53.6–67.2%) belonged to the burnout risk profile. Absence of weekly social activity was associated with higher odds of this risk profile (adjusted OR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.08–4.29; p = 0.029), whereas greater perceived workplace support was associated with lower odds (adjusted OR = 0.56 per one-point increase; 95% CI: 0.39–0.79; p = 0.001). Results were consistent with Firth penalized estimation; in the strictest sensitivity analysis restricted to the Burnout profile, perceived workplace support remained associated with the outcome, whereas weekly social activity did not. Burnout-related profiles were frequent among responding anesthesiology specialists in Türkiye, particularly profiles characterized by elevated emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization. Lower perceived workplace support was the factor most consistently associated with the burnout risk profile, and absence of weekly social activity was also independently associated with it. Given the cross-sectional design, these associations cannot establish causality; workplace support, work organization, and recovery opportunities warrant further longitudinal and interventional evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akesen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: